Open the tool

How does the tufted titmouse see?

The tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) is a bird in the order Passeriformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type UV songbird, parrot and hummingbird: 4 cones with a true UV (UVS) cone and oil droplets, high CFF; UV plumage patterns visible.

Measured in this species: sharpness, field of view, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

Sample scene drawn in code: a face with red lips, a green shirt, red and green apples, flowers and a colour strip, as a person sees it.
The sample scene as a person sees it.
The same sample scene rendered by the See Like Animals engine for the tufted titmouse's eyes, using the values in the table below.
The same scene rendered for the tufted titmouse (60° field of view, daylight).
See your photo as the tufted titmouseThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
4 receptor classes: 371.5 nm (UVS), 448 nm (SWS (blue)), 503 nm (MWS (green)), 563 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Cyanistes caeruleus (same family Paridae)
Estimated[1][2]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Estimated
SharpnessAcuity
6.57 cycles per degree
median of 1 anatomical-ganglion rows (method priority rule)
Measured[3]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
53°
median of 1 rows (eyes-at-rest rows preferred)
Measured[4]
Total field of view
319°
rule: total = 360 - blind area
Derived[5]
Blind area behind the head
41°
Measured[5]
Eye placement
lateral
frontal if binocular overlap >= 60 deg, else lateral
Derived[4]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
1
retinal topography
Measured (not re-verified)[6]
Fovea type
single central fovea (displaced dorso-temporally from retinal centre)
Measured (not re-verified)[6]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 4 rows (of 4 rows): diurnal; not_nocturnal; photopic
Measured (not re-verified)[7][8][9][10]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[7][8][9][10]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
91 Hz
median of 1 relatives in family Paridae: Cyanistes caeruleus
Estimated[11]

Other senses

Related animals

More birds: all birds with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Lind O, Mitkus M, Olsson P, Kelber A. 2014. Ultraviolet vision in birds: the importance of transparent eye media. Proc R Soc B 281:20132209. Table 1. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2209
  2. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  3. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  4. Tyrrell LP, Fernandez-Juricic E 2017. Avian binocular vision: it's not just about what birds can see, it's also about what they can't. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0173235. S1 Table.. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173235
  5. Tyrrell LP, Moore BA, Loftis C, Fernandez-Juricic E 2017 (data 2017). The hawk-eyed songbird: retinal morphology, eye shape, and visual fields of an aerial insectivore. Am Nat 189(6). Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.n7140.. doi.org/10.1086/691404
  6. Moore BA, Tyrrell LP, Pita D, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Fernandez-Juricic E 2017. Does retinal configuration make the head and eyes of foveate birds move? Sci Rep 7: 38406. Appendix 1.. doi.org/10.1038/srep38406
  7. Light conditions and the evolution of the visual system in birds (figshare dataset, SupplementaryDataset1). doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22116371.v3
  8. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W. 2014. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals. Ecology 95:2027. BirdFuncDat.txt. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3559887.v1
  9. Schmitz L, Motani R. 2011. Science 332:705-708, SOM. doi.org/10.1126/science.1200043
  10. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  11. Boström JE, Dimitrova M, Canton C, Håstad O, Qvarnström A, Ödeen A. 2016. Ultra-rapid vision in birds. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0151099. S1 Table. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151099
  12. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  13. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?