Open the tool

How does the water louse see?

The water louse (Asellus aquaticus) is a crustacean in the order Isopoda. Its eyes belong to the vision type Crustacean (mantis shrimp, crab).

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the water louseThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the water louse (Asellus aquaticus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
1 receptor class: 520 nm (MWS (green))
ESTIMATE: receptor classes from opsin-gene presence in this species; lambda max per class from the measured class template of the nearest taxon (never from the gene itself)
Group default[1][2]
SharpnessAcuity
0.05 cycles per degree
median of 1 relatives in order Isopoda: Natatolana borealis
Group default[3]
Angle between facets
1.6°
median of 1 relatives in class Malacostraca: Phronima sedentaria
Group default[4]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)No value in the catalogue.
Night visionActivity pattern
nocturnal
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V27 within phylum Arthropoda (1 species: Ligia exotica)
Group default[1]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Group default[1]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
51.3 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [51.3])
Measured[5]

Related animals

More crustaceans: all crustaceans with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. NCBI Protein database: opsin records for arthropod and mollusc taxa (short esearch queries, one taxon x one opsin term), kept only curated RefSeq NP_ or PubMed-linked GenBank records. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein
  3. Feller KD, Sharkey CR, McDuffee-Altekruse A, Bracken-Grissom HD, Lord NP, Porter ML, Schweikert LE 2021. Surf and turf vision: patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution. Arthropod Structure & Development 60:101002. doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2020.101002
  4. Bagheri Z, Jessop A, Partridge J et al. 2022. A new computational model illuminates the extraordinary eyes of Phronima. PLOS Computational Biology. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010545
  5. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  6. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  7. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?