Open the tool

How does the Asian swallowtail see?

The Asian swallowtail (Papilio xuthus) is a insect in the order Lepidoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Butterfly multispectral: 4-15 receptor classes incl. red, UV patterns.

Measured in this species: colour, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

Sample scene drawn in code: a face with red lips, a green shirt, red and green apples, flowers and a colour strip, as a person sees it.
The sample scene as a person sees it.
The same sample scene rendered by the See Like Animals engine for the Asian swallowtail's eyes, using the values in the table below.
The same scene rendered for the Asian swallowtail (60° field of view, daylight).
See your photo as the Asian swallowtailThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the Asian swallowtail (Papilio xuthus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
5 receptor classes: 360 nm (UVS), 400 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 440 nm (SWS (blue)), 520 nm (MWS (green)), 600 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured (not re-verified)[1][2][3]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured (not re-verified)
SharpnessAcuity
0.56 cycles per degree
median of 1 relatives in genus Papilio: Papilio machaon
Estimated[4]
Angle between facets
0.9°
median of 1 relatives in genus Papilio: Papilio machaon
Estimated[4]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 90 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[5]
Fovea type
none
Group default[5]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 1 rows (of 1 rows): diurnal
Measured[2]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[2]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
107 Hz
median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [107.0])
Measured[6]

Comparisons

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Kelber A, Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 2003. Animal colour vision - behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol Rev 78:81-118. doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102005985
  2. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  3. van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
  4. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  5. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  6. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  7. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  8. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?