Open the tool

How does the banded flower mantis see?

The banded flower mantis (Theopropus elegans) is a insect in the order Mantodea. Its eyes belong to the vision type Hunter insect (dragonfly, mantis).

Measured in this species: colour. Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the banded flower mantisThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the banded flower mantis (Theopropus elegans), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 356 nm (UVS), 441 nm (SWS (blue)), 525 nm (MWS (green))
measured in this species
Measured[1]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured
SharpnessAcuity
0.42 cycles per degree
median of 4 relatives in order Mantodea: Orthodera ministralis, Tenodera australasiae, Ciulfina biseriata, Orthodera novaezealandiae
Group default[2][3][4]
Angle between facets
0.9°
median of 2 relatives in order Mantodea: Orthodera ministralis, Tenodera australasiae
Group default[2]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[5]
Fovea type
none
Group default[5]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V25 within phylum Arthropoda (6 species: Anax junius, Hemicordulia tau, Aeshna cyanea, Aeshna tuberculifera, Libellula pulchella, Sympetrum rubicundulum)
Group default[6]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Group default[6]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
55.3 Hz
median of 1 relatives in order Mantodea: Tenodera australasiae
Group default[7]

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Qian R, Theobald J, Frank T 2025. Praying mantises possess multiple spectral photoreceptor classes. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. doi.org/10.1007/s00359-025-01776-z
  2. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  3. AndrewPMeade/FabricTools, sciphy/data_utils/datasets/Arthropod.CompoundEyes.csv (acuity, body length, light, media for 281 arthropods; columns match Feller et al. 2021 Arthropod Struct Dev 60:101002). github.com/AndrewPMeade/FabricTools
  4. Feller KD, Sharkey CR, McDuffee-Altekruse A, Bracken-Grissom HD, Lord NP, Porter ML, Schweikert LE 2021. Surf and turf vision: patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution. Arthropod Structure & Development 60:101002. doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2020.101002
  5. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  6. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  7. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  8. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  9. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?