Open the tool

How does the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans) see?

The tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans) is a insect in the order Diptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Fast fly (slow-motion world).

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans)This species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans) (Glossina morsitans), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 347.5 nm (UVS), 455 nm (SWS (blue)), 523 nm (MWS (green))
ESTIMATE: receptor classes from opsin-gene presence in this species; lambda max per class from the measured class template of the nearest taxon (never from the gene itself)
Group default[1][2][3][4]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Group default
SharpnessAcuity
0.63 cycles per degree
median of 1 relatives in genus Glossina: Glossina pallidipes
Estimated[5]
Angle between facets
4.05°
median of 50 relatives in order Diptera: Syritta pipiens, Tripteroides bambusa, Eristalis tenax, Calliphora vicina, Chrysomya megacephala, Bibio marci
Group default[6][7][8][9]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 91 relatives in order Diptera: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[10]
Fovea type
none
Group default[10]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V22 within phylum Arthropoda (7 species: Musca domestica, Drosophila melanogaster, Eristalis tenax, Periplaneta americana, Anopheles gambiae, Culex quinquefasciatus)
Group default[11][2]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Group default[11][2]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
217.5 Hz
median of 2 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [145.0, 290.0])
Measured[12][13]

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Guignard Q, Allison JD, Slippers B. 2022. The evolution of insect visual opsin genes with specific consideration of the influence of ocelli and life history traits. BMC Ecol Evol 22:2
  2. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  3. van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
  4. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  5. AndrewPMeade/FabricTools, sciphy/data_utils/datasets/Arthropod.CompoundEyes.csv (acuity, body length, light, media for 281 arthropods; columns match Feller et al. 2021 Arthropod Struct Dev 60:101002). github.com/AndrewPMeade/FabricTools
  6. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  7. Currea JP, Sondhi Y, Kawahara AY, Theobald J. 2023. Measuring compound eye optics with microscope and microCT images. Commun Biol 6:246
  8. Heras F, Laughlin S 2026. Investments in photoreceptors compete with investments in optics to determine eye design. eLife. doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96517
  9. Host-trailing satellite flight behaviour is associated with greater investment in peripheral visual sensory system in miltogrammine flies. Scientific Reports 12 (2022) (PMC8854417), Table 1.. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06704-3
  10. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  11. Feuda R, Marletaz F, Bentley MA, Holland PWH. 2016. Conservation, duplication, and divergence of five opsin genes in insect evolution. Genome Biol Evol 8:579-587
  12. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  13. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  14. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?