Open the tool

How does the western honey bee see?

The western honey bee (Apis mellifera) is a insect in the order Hymenoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Bee, ant and locust UV trichromat: 3 receptors (UV/blue/green), no red, very low acuity compound eye, fast CFF, polarisation.

Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, foveas, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

Sample scene drawn in code: a face with red lips, a green shirt, red and green apples, flowers and a colour strip, as a person sees it.
The sample scene as a person sees it.
The same sample scene rendered by the See Like Animals engine for the western honey bee's eyes, using the values in the table below.
The same scene rendered for the western honey bee (60° field of view, daylight).
See your photo as the western honey beeThis species is in the free set of the tool. Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the western honey bee (Apis mellifera), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 344 nm (UVS), 436 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 556 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured (not re-verified)[1][2][3]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured (not re-verified)
SharpnessAcuity
0.25 cycles per degree
median of 4 behavioural rows (method priority rule); acceptance_angle_deg: male / drone rows set aside (labelled alternative: 1.45); acuity_cpd: dim-light rows (bright-light rows used) set aside (labelled alternative…
Measured (not re-verified)[4]
Angle between facets
0.8°
minimum (acute-zone) interommatidial angle over sources; within caves2018: minimum (round-1 rule: mean of horizontal and vertical when both exist); interommatidial_angle_deg: male / drone rows set aside (labelled…
Measured[5]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
species-v1.csv text: frontal acute zone (compound eye)
Measured (not re-verified)[6]
Fovea type
acute zone
Measured[7][6]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 2 rows (of 2 rows): diurnal
Measured[8][9]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[8][9]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
220 Hz
median of 2 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [200.0, 240.0])
Measured[10][11]

Other senses

Comparisons

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Kelber A, Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 2003. Animal colour vision - behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol Rev 78:81-118. doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102005985
  2. Kirwan J. luxR 0.1.1: Underwater Light Analysis and Visual Ecology (R-universe), data species_sensitivities. github.com/JohnKirwan/luxR
  3. Porter ML et al. 2006 Table 1 (opsin accessions with lambda max; mostly cephalopod/arthropod) as extracted by VPOD. github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db
  4. Kelber A, Somanathan H 2019. Spatial Vision and Visually Guided Behavior in Apidae. Insects. doi.org/10.3390/insects10120418
  5. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  6. species_v1:Rigosi, Warrant & O'Carroll 2021
  7. Rigosi E, Warrant EJ, O'Carroll DC. 2021. A new, fluorescence-based method for visualizing the pseudopupil and assessing optical acuity in the dark compound eyes of honeybees and other insects. Scientific reports 11(1):21267. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00407-2
  8. Feuda R, Marletaz F, Bentley MA, Holland PWH. 2016. Conservation, duplication, and divergence of five opsin genes in insect evolution. Genome Biol Evol 8:579-587
  9. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  10. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  11. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  12. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?