Open the tool

How does the common garter snake see?

The common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) is a reptile in the order not recorded. Its eyes belong to the vision type Diurnal reptile tetrachromat.

Measured in this species: colour and night vision. Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the common garter snakeThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
4 receptor classes: 360 nm (UVS), 458 nm (SWS (blue)), 482 nm (MWS (green)), 554 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured[1]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured
SharpnessNo value in the catalogue.
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
2
mode of species-v1 relatives in class Squamata: Anolis carolinensis, Furcifer pardalis
Group default[2][3]
Fovea type
central fovea, temporal
Group default[2][3]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 7 rows (of 7 rows): Diurnal; cathemeral; cathemeral (polyphasic); diurnal; photopic
Measured (not re-verified)[4][1][5][6][7][8][9]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[4][1][5][6][7][8][9]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
34.6 Hz
median of 15 relatives in class Squamata: Phrynosoma cornutum, Sphaerodactylus inaguae, Anolis cristatellus, Anolis gundlachi, Anolis pulchellus, Iguana iguana
Group default[10][11][12][13]

Related animals

More reptiles: all reptiles with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. species_v1:Fleishman et al. 1988 / Makaretz & Levine 1980
  3. species_v1:Ott & Schaeffel 1995
  4. Banks MS, Sprague WW, Schmoll J, Parnell JAQ, Love GD. 2015. Science Advances 1:e1500391. doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500391
  5. Oskyrko O, Mi C, Meiri S, Du W. 2024. ReptTraits: a comprehensive dataset of ecological traits in reptiles. Scientific Data 11 (doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03079-5). Dataset v1-2 (includes Meiri 2018 lizard traits). doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24572683.v4
  6. Schmitz L, Motani R. 2011. Science 332:705-708, SOM. doi.org/10.1126/science.1200043
  7. Simoes BF, Sampaio FL, Douglas RH, et al. 2016. Mol Biol Evol 33:2483-2495. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw148
  8. Meiri 2024. SquamBase: a database of squamate (Reptilia: Squamata) traits. Global Ecol Biogeogr (data Zenodo 10602503).. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10602503
  9. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  10. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  11. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  12. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  13. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?