Open the tool

How does the painted turtle see?

The painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) is a reptile in the order not recorded. Its eyes belong to the vision type Diurnal reptile tetrachromat.

Measured in this species: night vision and motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the painted turtleThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
4 receptor classes: 360 nm (UVS), 450 nm (SWS (blue)), 518 nm (MWS (green)), 618.5 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Trachemys scripta (same family Emydidae)
Estimated[1][2]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Estimated
SharpnessNo value in the catalogue.
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
2
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V14 within phylum Chordata (1 species: Anolis carolinensis)
Group default[3][4]
Fovea type
central fovea, temporal
Group default[3][4]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 4 rows (of 4 rows): diurnal
Measured (not re-verified)[5][6][7][8]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[5][6][7][8]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
31 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [31.0])
Measured[9]

Related animals

More reptiles: all reptiles with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual Pigments (2004)
  3. Rasys AM, Wegerski A, Trainor PA, Hufnagel RB, Menke DB, Lauderdale JD. 2024. Dynamic changes in ocular shape during human development and its implications for retina fovea formation. BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology 46(1):e2300054. doi.org/10.1002/bies.202300054
  4. species_v1:Fleishman et al. 1988 / Makaretz & Levine 1980
  5. Anderson SR, Wiens JJ. 2017. Out of the dark: 350 million years of conservatism and evolution in diel activity patterns in vertebrates. Evolution 71:1944-1959. Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.fg700. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.fg700
  6. Banks MS, Sprague WW, Schmoll J, Parnell JAQ, Love GD. 2015. Science Advances 1:e1500391. doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500391
  7. Oskyrko O, Mi C, Meiri S, Du W. 2024. ReptTraits: a comprehensive dataset of ecological traits in reptiles. Scientific Data 11 (doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03079-5). Dataset v1-2 (includes Meiri 2018 lizard traits). doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24572683.v4
  8. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  9. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  10. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  11. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?