Open the tool

How does the Pacific spookfish see?

The Pacific spookfish (Rhinochimaera pacifica) is a shark or ray in the order Chimaeriformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shark, ray and warm-eyed ocean predator.

Measured in this species: sharpness. Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the Pacific spookfishThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the Pacific spookfish (Rhinochimaera pacifica), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
1 receptor class: 551 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Callorhinchus milii (same order Chimaeriformes)
Group default[1]
SharpnessAcuity
2.632 cycles per degree
median of 1 compilation rows (method priority rule)
Measured[2]
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)No value in the catalogue.
Night visionNo value in the catalogue.
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
28.5 Hz
group default: median of tier-A values in vision type V19 within phylum Chordata (20 species: Xiphias gladius, Negaprion brevirostris, Galeocerdo cuvier, Hemiscyllium ocellatum, Heterodontus portusjacksoni…
Group default[3][4][5][6][7]

Related animals

More sharks and rays: all sharks and rays with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Kirwan J. luxR 0.1.1: Underwater Light Analysis and Visual Ecology (R-universe), data species_sensitivities. github.com/JohnKirwan/luxR
  2. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Warrant EJ, Johnsen S 2023. Measures and models of visual acuity in epipelagic and mesopelagic teleosts and elasmobranchs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. zenodo.org/records/8251016
  3. Horodysky A, Brill R, Crawford K et al. (2013) Comparative visual ecophysiology of mid-Atlantic temperate reef fishes. Biology Open
  4. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  5. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  6. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  7. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?