Open the tool

How does the goldfish see?

The goldfish (Carassius auratus) is a fish in the order Cypriniformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shallow-water fish tetrachromat: 4 cones incl. UV and far-red; archerfish and four-eyed fish add dual-medium optics.

Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

Sample scene drawn in code: a face with red lips, a green shirt, red and green apples, flowers and a colour strip, as a person sees it.
The sample scene as a person sees it.
The same sample scene rendered by the See Like Animals engine for the goldfish's eyes, using the values in the table below.
The same scene rendered for the goldfish (60° field of view, daylight).
See your photo as the goldfishThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the goldfish (Carassius auratus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
4 receptor classes: 360 nm (UVS), 455 nm (SWS (blue)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 614 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured (not re-verified)[1][2][3]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured (not re-verified)
SharpnessAcuity
3 cycles per degree
median of 7 behavioural rows (method priority rule)
Measured[4]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
32.85°
median of 2 relatives in family Cyprinidae: Danio rerio, Notemigonus crysoleucas
Estimated[5]
Eye placement
lateral
Estimated[5]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (2 species: Toxotes jaculatrix, Anableps anableps)
Group default[6][7]
Fovea type
ventrotemporal area (high rgc density)
Group default[6][7]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (1 species: Amphiprion ocellaris)
Group default[8]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
Group default[8]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
53.6 Hz
median of 2 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [40.0, 67.2])
Measured[9][10]

Comparisons

Related animals

More fish: all fish with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Schweikert LE, Fitak RR, Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S. 2018. Spectral sensitivity in ray-finned fishes: diversity, ecology and shared descent. J Exp Biol 221:jeb189761. Table S1. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.189761
  2. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  3. Hárosi F, MacNichol E (1974) Visual Pigments of Goldfish Cones. The Journal of General Physiology
  4. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S (2017) Visual acuity in ray-finned fishes correlates with eye size and habitat. J Exp Biol 220:1586-1596. Table S1.. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.151183
  5. Pita D, Moore BA, Tyrrell LP, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2015. Vision in two cyprinid fish: implications for collective behavior. PeerJ 3:e1113.. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1113
  6. species_v1:Schwab et al. 2001
  7. species_v1:Temple et al. 2010
  8. Froese R. & Pauly D. (eds). FishBase, snapshot v25.04 (morphmet, morphdat, species, families tables), distributed as parquet by C. Boettiger for rfishbase.. fishbase.org
  9. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  10. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  11. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?