Open the tool

How does the spiny chromis see?

The spiny chromis (Acanthochromis polyacanthus) is a fish in the order Perciformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shallow-water fish tetrachromat.

Measured in this species: night vision and motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the spiny chromisThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the spiny chromis (Acanthochromis polyacanthus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
5 receptor classes: 359 nm (UVS), 386 nm (UVS), 463 nm (SWS (blue)), 470 nm (SWS (blue)), 514 nm (MWS (green))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Dascyllus albisella (same family Pomacentridae)
Estimated[1][2][3]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Estimated
SharpnessAcuity
3.03 cycles per degree
median of 4 relatives in family Pomacentridae: Dascyllus marginatus, Amblyglyphidodon curacao, Pomacentrus amboinensis, Amphiprion akindynos
Estimated[4][5][6]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
32.85°
group default: median of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (2 species: Danio rerio, Notemigonus crysoleucas)
Group default[7]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
mode of species-v1 relatives in order Perciformes: Toxotes jaculatrix
Group default[8]
Fovea type
ventrotemporal area (high rgc density)
Group default[8]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 1 rows (of 1 rows): diurnal
Measured[9]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[9]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
89 Hz
median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [89.0])
Measured[10]

Related animals

More fish: all fish with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Losey GS et al. 2003. Visual biology of Hawaiian coral reef fishes. I. Ocular transmission and visual pigments. Copeia 2003:433-454. doi.org/10.1643/01-053
  2. Schweikert LE, Fitak RR, Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S. 2018. Spectral sensitivity in ray-finned fishes: diversity, ecology and shared descent. J Exp Biol 221:jeb189761. Table S1. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.189761
  3. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  4. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S (2017) Visual acuity in ray-finned fishes correlates with eye size and habitat. J Exp Biol 220:1586-1596. Table S1.. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.151183
  5. Caves EM, Fernandez-Juricic E, Kelley LA (2024) Ecological and morphological correlates of visual acuity in birds. J Exp Biol 227(2): jeb246063. Supplementary Table S1.. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.246063
  6. Stieb SM, de Busserolles F, Carleton KL, et al. (2019) A detailed investigation of the visual system and visual ecology of the Barrier Reef anemonefish, Amphiprion akindynos. Sci Rep 9:16459
  7. Pita D, Moore BA, Tyrrell LP, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2015. Vision in two cyprinid fish: implications for collective behavior. PeerJ 3:e1113.. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1113
  8. species_v1:Temple et al. 2010
  9. Froese R. & Pauly D. (eds). FishBase, snapshot v25.04 (morphmet, morphdat, species, families tables), distributed as parquet by C. Boettiger for rfishbase.. fishbase.org
  10. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  11. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  12. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?