Open the tool

How does the lemon pansy see?

The lemon pansy (Junonia lemonias) is a insect in the order Lepidoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Butterfly multispectral.

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the lemon pansyThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the lemon pansy (Junonia lemonias), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
1 receptor class: 510 nm (MWS (green))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Junonia coenia (same genus Junonia)
Estimated[1][2]
SharpnessAcuity
0.52 cycles per degree
median of 20 relatives in family Nymphalidae: Caligo memnon, Caligo eurilochus, Asterocampa leilia, Morpho peleides, Parthenos sylvia, Polygonia c-album
Estimated[3][4][5][6]
Angle between facets
0.98°
median of 9 relatives in family Nymphalidae: Caligo memnon, Caligo eurilochus, Asterocampa leilia, Morpho peleides, Parthenos sylvia, Polygonia c-album
Estimated[3]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[7]
Fovea type
none
Group default[7]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 15 relatives in family Nymphalidae: Pararge aegeria, Polygonia c-album, Danaus plexippus, Heliconius melpomene, Melitaea cinxia, Aglais urticae
Estimated[8][9][10]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Estimated[8][9][10]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
203 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [203.0])
Measured[11]

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Porter ML et al. 2006 Table 1 (opsin accessions with lambda max; mostly cephalopod/arthropod) as extracted by VPOD. github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db
  2. van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
  3. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  4. AndrewPMeade/FabricTools, sciphy/data_utils/datasets/Arthropod.CompoundEyes.csv (acuity, body length, light, media for 281 arthropods; columns match Feller et al. 2021 Arthropod Struct Dev 60:101002). github.com/AndrewPMeade/FabricTools
  5. Feller KD, Sharkey CR, McDuffee-Altekruse A, Bracken-Grissom HD, Lord NP, Porter ML, Schweikert LE 2021. Surf and turf vision: patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution. Arthropod Structure & Development 60:101002. doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2020.101002
  6. Wright DS, Manel AN, Guachamin-Rosero M, Chamba-Vaca P, Bacquet CN, Merrill RM 2023. Quantifying visual acuity in Heliconius butterflies. Biology Letters. zenodo.org/records/10127023
  7. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  8. Feuda R, Marletaz F, Bentley MA, Holland PWH. 2016. Conservation, duplication, and divergence of five opsin genes in insect evolution. Genome Biol Evol 8:579-587
  9. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  10. Sondhi Y, Ellis EA, Bybee SM, Theobald JC, Kawahara AY. 2021. Light environment drives evolution of color vision genes in butterflies and moths. Commun Biol 4:177
  11. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  12. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  13. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?