See Like Animals Open the tool
Menu

Cheetah vision: the science and the numbers

Acinonyx jubatus · order Carnivora · Mammals: all the numbers

Its sharpest vision resolves 23.02 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[5] Its activity pattern is diurnal.[12][13][14][15][16]

See it on your photoBack to How does the cheetah see?
  • 23.02cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured

The cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) is a mammal in the order Carnivora. Its eyes belong to the vision type Night-hunting cat: two cone types, a rod-rich retina with a reflective layer for dim light, and a wide zone seen by both eyes. Measured in this species: sharpness, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.

This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.

Method: How we know what animals see (the See Like Animals vision engine) · Sources · Last updated . Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

What the cheetah sees: colour receptors

Cheetah colour receptor peaks, 300 to 700 nmCheetah: 2 receptor peaks at 450, 555 nm; you: 3 at 421.5, 532, 558.4 nm. ultraviolet300400500600700
Cheetah: 450, 555 nmPeople: 421.5, 532, 558.4 nmWavelength in nanometres

What stands out

  • Its sharpest vision resolves 23.02 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
  • Activity pattern: diurnal.

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.

Vision values for the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSourcesPeople
ColourColour receptors
2 receptor classes: 450 nm (SWS (blue)), 555 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Felis catus (same family Felidae)
Estimated[1]Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[1][2][3][4]
SharpnessAcuity
23.02 cycles per degree
median of 1 anatomical-ganglion rows (method priority rule)
Measured[5]Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[6][5]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
112.5°
median of 1 relatives in family Felidae: Felis catus
Estimated[7][8]Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[7][8]
Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[9]
Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[9]
Eye placement: frontal Derived[7][8]
Total field of view
250°
median species-v1 total field of order Carnivora: Canis familiaris
Group default[10]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
fovea_present / area_centralis_type (retinal topography; count 1 = fovea present, 0 = none)
Measured[11]Number of foveas: 1 Measured[11]
Fovea type: fovea Measured[11]
Fovea type
area centralis, horizontal streak		Measured[11]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 5 rows (of 5 rows): diurnal
Measured (not re-verified)[12][13][14][15][16]Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[17][18][13][1][14][15][19][16]
Pupil shape: vertical Group default[12][20]
Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[21]
Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[17][18][13][1][14][15][19][16]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[12][13][14][15][16]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
75 Hz
median of 1 relatives in family Felidae: Felis catus
Estimated[22]Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[23][24]

All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.

Sources

  1. Longcore 2023
  2. Kirwan
  3. Müller et al. 2009
  4. Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
  5. Veilleux et al. 2014
  6. Kirk et al. 2004
  7. Heesy 2004
  8. Heffner et al. 1992
  9. Campbell & Green 1965
  10. Miller & Murphy 1995
  11. Kopania et al. 2025
  12. Banks et al. 2015
  13. Wilman et al. 2014
  14. Maor et al. 2017
  15. Jones et al. 2009
  16. Moura et al. 2024
  17. Anderson et al. 2017
  18. Borges et al. 2018
  19. Schmitz et al. 2011
  20. Cervino et al. 2021
  21. Guareschi et al. 2025
  22. Lafitte et al. 2022
  23. Healy et al. 2013
  24. Inger et al. 2014

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.